I was curious about this adaptation because I think 変な家 must be quite hard to bring to the screen. A lot of the mystery comes from looking at floor plans, discovering what is strange and let your imagination run wild, imagining what horrible truths the floor plan could hide.
I think that the adaptation was very good, but at the same time, it also couldn’t really convey what made the book so fascinating. I’d say that the houses were the real center point of the horror in the book, but it shifts to the characters instead in the book. Not that it’s a bad thing, I found it was really well done, some characters in the second half were really creepy.
As for our trio of main characters, I found them a bit too… lethargic? I felt the trio kind of lacked dynamism, which I found a bit irritating. And I personally did not like the film’s portraying of Kurihara, it was just too exaggerated, the character too eccentric.
Overall, I enjoyed watching it, but I also think it’s just less good than the book, because it keeps very close to it, but cannot use the floor plans as well as the book did, so it lost a lot of its impact. Maybe they should have gone with a complete different approach? Action scenes towards the end were quite good, but I think a lot of that horror feeling we get when reading Uketsu comes from the realisation, that moment when we understand what had happened, what the particularities of the house are meant for, it doesn’t come from action scene or our protagonist being in danger.
So on the one hand, the film is not bad, but on the other hand, it also feels unnecessary? Because it lost what made the book so impactful, but also did not really offered a different view.